Why don’t some composers get recognition? Wagging the long coda

I am not a musical academic and at best I might describe my my forays into music as being driven just by the pure pleasure of it all rather than that of an amateur music lover with an interest of the theory. This year I’ve been focusing on orchestral music and particular that of the 20th century. As I explore the various sources that I search for music it amazes me how much original ‘classical’ music is being composed and also how many composers that I’ve never heard of who have substantive bodies of work. Even more fascinating is that this music is approachable and accessible even to those that don’t like the more extreme and avant-garde musical movements of the last 120 years.

Today I’ve been listening to the symphonies of Karl Amadeus Hartmann. KA Hartman is one of a bunch of German composers of whom I’ve only recently become aware. As the Wikipedia entry says – he might be the greatest but also least known German symphonist of the twentieth century. Hartman’s music is excellent and well worth purchasing. It has always been a question why contemporary and past composers don’t get recognition – why some are in fashion and others out. Who knows, for example, whether Nico Muhly will be well known only decades after his death?

These are some of my thoughts on the matter.

Almost all of the major composers of the 20th century that might be considered household names (in classically oriented households) were also the leaders of their own musical movements and in some, but not all cases, wrote in a style that was instantly recognisable. For example in Minimalism everybody knows Glass and Reich. The knowledgable might also know Riley and Adams…but then it runs dry even though there are other exponents.

Following on from this I’d say that neoclassicism is frowned upon. On one hand the audiences want palatable music and it simply can’t be the case that all of the good tunes are taken already. On the other hand the critical audience also wants novelty and invention. The music must have an idea – musical pleasure and satisfaction is not enough.

Language and Nationalism also play a role. Except for the megastars of the compositional world commissions and premiere performances focus on the local.This likely favours the American and European composer in their own regions. Getting onto foreign programs requires conductors to champion the cause and audience engagement.

The new or under recognised composer’s compositions are often relegated to be the warm-up act in orchestral programming – they get the first half of the program while the major names get the second half.

There isn’t enough promotion of composers composing music that you can just sit and listen to – whether in live performance or on recordings. Many composers write for the cinema and people leave their films saying ‘what a great soundtrack’ yet few people seek out the composers ‘serious’ work.

Finally, I think the search engines in online stores are very deficient. Occasionally I will make finds using the iTunes Genius function but it surprises me how infrequently Genius makes the matches that I make by broader reading. And more often than not I have to try multiple search terms to locate the piece of music I am looking for. There needs to be an archetype for the metadata associated with this music to better enable finding interesting music in the long tail…or should I say coda.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s